“Grendel”
In the book Grendel by John Gardner, figuring out who the antagonist is quite the challenge. If you take a quick look at the story from different points of views, each character has the characteristics that could relate them, or lead us to think they’re the one causing or about to cause the problem. Beowulf has a different outlook on this subject, as do we all. The monster, more know as Grendel, is facing the rejection from most characters. He strikes one as being a blood thirsty monster, going on rages to kill anything in site, human or animal.
From a different point of view, Grendel views the dragon as a charade. Most people, not only in class, but also online, see the dragon as a God-like figure, but to me, it’s the complete opposite. The way he mocks Grendel leads me to believe that he cannot be taken seriously. Grendel doesn’t know how to react or show any reaction towards this dragon. What would happen if he even chuckled? Would he be burned into fiery shreds? Would God act in this certain manner, scare away and be vicious to people seeking the truth?
When Beowulf and Grendel had their fray, wings and fiery eyes “appeared” on Beowulf’s form. Why would Grendel envision a man who is about to tear him limb from limb as God? Perhaps, the dragon morphed himself into Beowulf to take advantage of such a distorted mind. It seems like Grendel was scared to fight back, like a parents arguing with their child. Grendel held back and just tried to move away from Beowulf’s reach. The way we make ourselves picture Grendel is a humongous beast with sharp razor teeth and the strength of 100 men. If this is so, why couldn’t he have fought away with such an arrogant human. A greater power must have taken over Beowulf’s body, perhaps a devil or the dragon who I am lead to believe are two in one.
I take pity on Grendel for such a mistaken death. This failure of his, wasn’t and wont get away with being “meaningless”. The significance of this failure and Grendel’s realization is as a result of Beowulf’s success and the arrogance it brings to his head, his shoulders weigh down. A heavy shoulder that he cannot do anything about except being the pain upon a creature that can’t even help himself.
Grendel, hopeless and declined, goes back to the place where we first met him at the beginning of the book. The cliff, where he shared a view with animals that would get a joy of watching his painful death. The cliff, where he looked at the world and tried to figure out what message a cruel place could bring. Grendel finally realized he’ll never have an answer, and as for searching, the search is deadly and will rip you apart. The failure of a search and finding emptiness will kill you quicker than a knife itself.
Cathy -- I really was intrigued by your idea that the dragon sort of possessed Beowulf into something more-than-human.I hadn't thought about it that way at all, and who knows if that was the author's true intent? Still, in my opinion, it was Grendel's imagination that caused Beowulf to sprout wings of fire and all of that. Unfortunately, I cannot seem to find a clear-cut answer to the question of who is the antagonist in "Grendel." From how you wrote your essay, it seems like either Beowulf or the dragon is the antagonist, but there is no way of knowing for sure. At the end of the essay, I really liked your final line saying, "The failure of a search and finding emptiness will kill you quicker than a knife itself." That is some intense choice of words! I completely agree that, because Grendel never found his purpose or calling, emptiness and loneliness took over, eventually resulting in his (assumed) suicide.
ReplyDeleteCathy, it was not clear in your essay exactly who you consider to be the antagonist (although I take it you think it is the dragon). That being said, I must admit I thought the same thing about Beowulf actually being the dragon! When Gardner likens Beowulf to the dragon, I too felt that it must have been intentional. I took it as a betrayal by the dragon toward Grendel as he "disguises" himself and destroys him. I appreciate the fact that you introduced this unique idea and it truly resonated with me. I also like the theory that in searching for answers, one destroys oneself. I propose a similar idea in my essay and I believe that it is a very interesting subject which can make an entirely different essay by itself! Overall, good job on this assignment, although the different points you made could have flown better.
ReplyDeleteCatarina, your essay poses a great debate on everyone's different perspective on who the antagonist of the novel really is. Nevertheless, your essay is lacking in a thesis. The point of the thesis is to be argumentative, candid, and defendible so that your reader can be swayed by your own single view. Nevertheless, your essay seems to have the reader jumping back and forth between antagonists. Your essay covers all bases in terms of who the antagonist could be, whether the dragon or Beowulf, but the point of the essay is to have one clear stand and defend it with clear facts, i.e. quotes from the book and analyses. Overall, Catarina, your essay is written very mind-questioning and philosophically, per se, but that is not the point of this essay.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeletenumara onay
turkcell mobil ödeme bozdurma
Nft Nasıl Alinir
Ankara evden eve nakliyat
trafik sigortası
DEDEKTÖR
web sitesi kurma
aşk kitapları
smm panel
ReplyDeleteSmm Panel
iş ilanları
instagram takipçi satın al
hirdavatci
beyazesyateknikservisi.com.tr
SERVİS
tiktok jeton hilesi
Good content. You write beautiful things.
ReplyDeletekorsan taksi
mrbahis
sportsbet
vbet
hacklink
sportsbet
hacklink
mrbahis
taksi